|
|
Thursday, January 12, 2006
[The things people come up with...] ^^^ by Locksley @ 9:41 PM.
4 comments.
[Comments]
Since when was $1,000 reasonable?
However, if it gets rid of background music on blogs, then by god I'll be happy :)
They're just trying to tap into the profits of blogging. Blogging is now becoming a business, and some people are full-time bloggers.
Actually "blogging" is an overhyped term coined in recent years. People have been making personal webpages for a damn long time.
Anyways, when we purchase the music, it's only the right of consumption and not right of distribution (how unfortunate). I'd agree with Mr Brown about how fans operating blogs are actually giving free publicity. If the music played are by local musicians, all the more music streaming gotta continue because we know we only get MTV junk on radio these days. (I hold the same opinion with distribution of indie band music through P2P). If you ask me, all these fight against music piracy booogeyfuckhoo is just a huge conspiracy of music monopoly where big labels shut down all the quality music produced in garages and home studios. But yea.. I find blogs streaming music extremely annoying. Especially now that I broke the codec, they screw up my browser with error messages. (Longest comment ever, Peace \/^-^ )
peanuts? They're interfering our rights in the blogosphere!
[<---Back to Main]
If you want to read the full article or see a full insight into the issue, you can visit http://alchemistglobetrekker.blogspot.com/2006/01/pay-to-play-when-i-first-read-article.html |
|
|